App Name

Beginning Rate

Structured for…





…people searching for future interactions and relationship

Advantageous to LTR, reliable pages, distinctive matching program

Costly, less accommodating to everyday daters



…all-round dating, everyday and really serious

Caters generally, more cost-effective, huge user base

Many sedentary users



…all-round matchmaking, bending towards hook-ups and casual

Swiping system yields fast matches, discovers folks in your own quick place

Less good to LTR or major connections

Top-notch Singles


…white-collar professionals

Beneficial to online dating and networking, satisfy individuals on the same socio-economic amount for your requirements

Expensive for a niche, more minimal swimming pool of customers



…women who desire more control of these online dating share; men that like strong ladies

Female-friendly functions including some sort of “veto” power for females customers

Expensive, however a rising user base (yet not terrible)



LGBT – primarily guys pursuing males

Very reasonable, big individual base

Powerful target hook-up tradition, less lots of seeking LTR

The Woman


LGBT – largely womenwomen seeking women

Good functions, good individual base, user-friendly

Limited swiping on complimentary reports; no hands-on search purpose